A recurring theme in the gas tax debate involves allegations of waste, fraud, and abuse since Governor Scott Walker and Republicans have taken control of the Department of Transportation (DOT). A Legislative Audit Bureau report issued early this year is offered as evidence.
Here’s a question: If the audit is authoritative proof of mismanagement, what about this finding of the auditors (emphasis added):
DOT generally had effective oversight of the processes for soliciting bids and awarding construction contracts and took steps to control construction costs, but it could take additional steps.
Department critics skate by that significant conclusion. It doesn’t fit their narrative.
Instead, according to WMC lobbyist Scott Manley, the audit “found that DOT failed to save $289 million by not meeting its own performance goals.” (Separately, Senator Robert Cowles, co-chair of the Legislative Audit Committee, wrote at the time of the audit’s release: “DOT potentially could have saved $191.9 million over 6 yrs if it had met its annual on-budget performance measure goals.”)
Splitting the difference between Manley and Cowles, let’s stipulate that DOT could have saved $250 million during the 6-year period covered by the audit. Total highway spending in that period was $12 billion. So, “potential” inefficiencies amounted to a decidedly modest 2 percent of highway spending.
Manley could not resist delivering a whopper that has been repeated by others. He claimed the audit “found sixteen DOT projects had collectively run over budget by more than $3 billion.”
No, it did not. The audit found several projects that were delayed up to eighteen years after initial approval. Unsurprisingly, the final costs would be substantially higher than the original budget estimates. Updated cost estimates were provided twice a year to the governor and the legislature. Can DOT do a better job of explaining the inflationary impact of projects delayed by insufficient funds? Yes. Were the governor and legislators kept in the dark about that impact? Decidedly no.
In December of 2016, Walker’s transportation department issued a detailed report that identified $1.5 billion in one-time and ongoing savings from improved management and design of highway projects. Here’s a link to the report. I previously have challenged DOT critics to identify and refute the accuracy of any savings identified, savings which are five times greater than the amount called out by Manley. The response? Crickets.
Several Republican Senators have made a particular point of alleging waste at DOT. One recently said it’s not a “conservative” approach to give more money to a mismanaged agency. During the same news cycle Senate Republicans endorsed $750 million in new borrowing for highway projects.
Some concluding questions:
If DOT in fact is mismanaged, why borrow $750 million on top of the billions in new debt already OK’d since the GOP took control in 2010? Why not “live within our means” and go to the base budget?
Or, as some claim, if DOT has been whipped into shape by a new secretary, why harp on (bogus) claims about past management? That’s history. DOT says it accepts all the audit findings. Time to move on.
